Why Permit #16245 matters
Permit #16245 is repeatedly referenced in the historical record. The issue is whether the permit facially identifies the Reed parcel and Reed well location, or whether it identifies a different property.
Identifier comparison
| Identifier | Permit #16245 / related 1990 permit record | Reed parcel / subject well location |
|---|---|---|
| Permit number | Permit #16245 | Subject well claimed by DEH to relate to Reed parcel |
| Address | 44135 Perryman Lane | 44100 Ginger Circle |
| APN | 571-030-037 | 571-040-002 |
| Record of Survey / parcel reference | RS 53/47 Parcel 3 / Perryman-related parcel reference | RS 53/40 Parcel 2 |
Record conflict: If Permit #16245 identifies 44135 Perryman Lane / APN 571-030-037 / RS 53/47 Parcel 3, then it does not facially identify 44100 Ginger Circle / APN 571-040-002 / RS 53/40 Parcel 2.
Questions created by the permit record
- What contemporaneous record corrected Permit #16245 from the Perryman/APN 571-030-037 identifiers to the Reed/APN 571-040-002 identifiers?
- Who requested any correction or amendment, and what authority allowed the correction?
- What record shows owner authorization for a well permit affecting the Reed parcel?
- What record shows that Permit #16245 was lawfully used to regulate a well on APN 571-040-002?